
For your second essay, you will choose either William Shakespeare's play Henry V or Richard III, and write a one-thousand-word argument on it. As with the previous essay, you will create a thesis statement that reflects your opinion about what you think Shakespeare is saying about the topic you choose. Your essay will then support the argument put forth in the thesis. For a thesis to be sound, you should be able to answer "yes" to the following question: Could a reasonably intelligent reader familiar with the play logically disagree with what I'm arguing? Remember also that the thesis must be an opinion of what you believe Shakespeare is saying about the topic, not your views about the topic. Use incidents and lines from the play to support your argument. When you quote lines from the text, document them according to these guidelines:
If you have trouble understanding what I mean by a thesis, then check out the link on my website dealing with the thesis statement. The above form of documentation is referred to as in-text documentation. To complement it, you will also have to include a works cited page at the end of your paper. Such a page would appear as follows: Work Cited Shakespeare, William. Richard III. Ed. Barbara A. Mowat and Paul Werstine. New
Of course, if you use any source that influences your essay--whether through direct quotation, paraphrase, or summary--you must give credit to that source, in the text of your essay and in the work cited page. For further information about how and what to document, and how to avoid plagiarism, visit my website on documentation. I will read rough drafts of your essay, so don't hesitate to show me what you're working on; however, once you turn in your essay, you may not rewrite for a different grade. Also, it would be prudent to show me the thesis of your essay before you hand it in. The due date for the essay is on your syllabus. Think, write, and rewrite. Good luck! |