|





|
Once
the critical thinking activity is designed, but before opening
the discussion to students, the instructor should develop a list
of criteria for assessing the effectiveness of the student's contributions
to the online discussion. In other words, what answers would the
instructor expect to see. Depending on the activity, 2 or 3 main
opinions might be expected. Along with the opinions what supporting
evidence is expected for each opinion? What other expectations are
there; good grammar, complete sentences? Did the student answer
all of the proposed questions?
Paul
and Elder list several standards for assessing thinking: clarity,
precision, accuracy, relevance, depth, breadth,and logic. (1)
The four questions
by Wolcott and Lynch that were used as a guideline for the responses
in online discussions provide even more information for guiding
criteria.
was
an opinion stated? was there a basis for the opinion?
did
the student think their opinion was correct and if so why?
did
they consider other points of view?
did
they determine that one opinion was better than another? (2)
Mapping
out the potential possibilities before reading student answers makes
it easier to determine if student responses are complete and well
thought out. Because there is no one correct answer, creating a rubric
with the possibilities plotted out will help the instructor respond
in ways eliciting further thought. |