REVIEW OF LITERARY TERMS FROM ENGLISH 112
LITERATURE: Technically, literature
means "anything written." Even your grocery list would qualify. But
the academic word usually means imaginative literature, which in turn means
fiction as opposed to non-fiction. The term applies to novels, short stories,
poems, plays, movies, and all TV shows that aren't news shows, documentaries,
or interviews of real people. Whether or not it applies to shows like "The
Jerry Springer Show" depends on whether you think the featured stories are
true or made up. If they're made up they're fiction, even if the producers
claim they're true. WORTH NOTING: The phony factualizing of fiction, a
big current trend in movies and television, may suggest that in today's
"Information Age" we value fiction less than most cultures have in
the past. What do you think? Has fiction lost its value, or are we kidding
ourselves to think we need it less now than past people have?
Goodness! Do you mean writers are liars?
Why would anybody choose to lie instead of telling the truth? Crooks and salesmen may have their own reasons for
lying. But writers lie in order to suggest a greater truth that the facts don't
always show clearly. Writers create a sequence of events that conveys an idea
they have about how the world works.
Often this involves taking a long-range view
of cause and effect rather than a short-range view of cause and effect. For
example, a newspaper story about asthma on the rise in urban slums might blame
cockroaches for the problem. But a fiction writer would look beyond the
cockroaches to the human cause--maybe the greed of landlords and politicians.
Can the facts demonstrate that human greed is the real cause? Maybe not. But
fiction can show us why this is a plausible theory. At the same time, fiction
isn't bound by the rules of rational argument. A fiction writer is free to make
us feel another person's pain without having to prove the pain exists, as a
lawyer would have to. A fiction writer is also free to make us feel anger at
social injustice, or pity at the waste of youth, talent, or life.
Writers normally don't try to explain the
entire world in a single story. They pick some part of it to deal with, often
to expose a particular problem that's bothering them. That problem could involve
conflicts among individuals, conflicts of man with nature, conflicts of man
with himself, or conflicts of man with his own society. (See plot,
below.)
There are seven so-called elements of
fiction. These are the structural "working parts" of a story that
a writer manipulates in order to build his theory or theories. When writing
about fiction you've read, you talk about how a writer uses these tools to make
a point. (In the process, of course, you also write about what point he makes.)
ELEMENTS OF FICTION
PLOT: You analyze the plot of a story not by simply repeating what happens,
but by explaining why it happens and what point(s) this proves. You do that by
listing all the conflicts you can find, grouping them according to type, and
thinking about which ones are most important and why. (Conflicts are of 4
types: man vs. man, man vs. society, man vs. self, and man vs. nature.)
- Example
for 251 students: King Gilgamesh is in conflict with Humbaba, the Bull of
Heaven, and Ishtar. These are conflicts with nature. His friend Enkidu is
in conflict with the prostitute and with Gilgamesh over the way life in
the palace weakens him. This is a conflict with society. Enkidu and
Gilgamesh are also in conflict with one another over the right way to
live. This is an interpersonal (man vs. man) conflict. Which of these
three conflicts is the most important, and why? Your answer to that
question will determine your opinion about the story's main theme. See theme,
below.
- Example
for 252 students: The barrelmaker is in conflict with other men (notably
Kyushichi the servant) over who will win Osen. This is an interpersonal
conflict. Later he's in conflict with Osen over her alleged affair with
Chozaemon. This is another interpersonal conflict. The matchmaker is in
conflict with the barrelmaker, Osen, and Osen's employers whenever they
resist her schemes, which are her only way of making money. This is more
of a conflict with society. Several of the characters are in conflict with
their sexual feelings. This could be seen as a conflict with self or a
conflict with nature, depending on why you think it exists or how you
think it works. Which of these many conflicts is the most important, and
why? Your answer to that question will determine your opinion about the
story's main theme. See theme, below.
CHARACTERIZATION: You talk about who the people in the story are, what
their conflicts are (see above), what motivates them, why they do what they do.
You also talk about what (if anything) they learn in the story and why.
- Example
for 251 students: These are some important questions about
characterization in Gilgamesh. Why is Gilgamesh such a bad king to
begin with, and why does he change? Does he actually learn something? If
so, what? What does Enkidu gain from his friendship with Gilgamesh, and
what does he lose? On balance, is what he gains more important than what
he loses, or is it the other way around? Why?
- Example
for 252 students: These are some important questions about
characterization in Saikaku's story. Why is it so easy to convince Osen
that she loves the barrelmaker? Why is it so easy to get her employers to
go along? Is Osen really happy in marriage? Is the barrelmaker? How can we
tell?
SETTING: You discuss what difference the setting of the story makes to the
conflicts and characters. The setting could be the place of the story, the time
of the story, or the type of society that dominates the story.
- Example
for 251 students: What significance does it have that Enkidu comes from
the wild, goes into the city, and leads Gilgamesh back into the wild? What
significance does it have that Gilgamesh then has to go back into the wild
to discover how to be a civilized king in Uruk, the city?
- Example
for 252 students: What kind of place is Osaka, where the story takes place?
Is it a big city or a provincial town trying to pass for a big city? How
can you tell? Why does it matter?
POINT OF VIEW: The point of view is the attitude and voice of the
narrator of the story. Always remember that the narrator is distinct from the
author himself. Were that not the case, the story would be biography or
autobiography rather than fiction. The narrator is often just another character
in the story. He may be right or wrong, good or evil, likable or not.
- Example
for 251 students: What sort of person is telling this story? In what
context? Why is there so much chanting and repeating of key lines?
- Example
for 252 students: The narrator of this story doesn't always mean what he
says. Often when he makes moral judgments, he's being sarcastic. When is
he sarcastic, and why? What does his sarcasm suggest about the author's
attitudes toward the conventional moral beliefs of his day?
IRONY: You talk about the things in the story that are really screwed
up--usually the opposite of what they should be or what we would nornally
expect. All stories have many such features. Why? Because the author is
offering you his/her theory of how the world works. If he thought the world
worked just exactly the way we expect, he wouldn't have anything surprising or
interesting to tell us.
- Examples
for 251 students: Enkidu goes into the city to learn civilized human ways
from Gilgamesh, but winds up teaching him more humanity than he learns
from him. What's the significance of this irony? On the other hand, Gilgamesh
shuns the role of king and dresses up like an animal in order to go into
the wilderness to save Enkidu. But he learns instead that he has no choice
except to forget Enkidu and go back to Uruk and accept the role of king of
the city. What's the significance of this irony? Utnapishtim was granted
immortality by the gods, which is what Gilgamesh seeks for himself and
Enkidu. But Utnapishtim regards immortality as a curse rather than a
blessing. He says that no one who actually has immortality would want it.
What's the significance of this irony?
- Examples
for 252 students: Osen and Chozaemon are celebrated in local ballads as
two people who died for the sake of their illicit love. But they never
felt love for one another and were interrupted before they even had sex.
Moreover, the real motive for their entanglement was hatred, not love.
What's the significance of these ironies? The matchmaker made more money
as an abortionist than she will ever make as a matchmaker. What's the
significance of this irony? The young people of Osaka all seem to go on
religious pilgrimmages because it's the only way they can respectably
flirt with the opposite sex. What's the signifiance of this irony?
SYMBOLISM: You talk about the specific details of the story
which seem to have hidden meanings. That is, the characters treat them as if
they have hidden importance, or we spontaneously recognize that they have
hidden importance. All stories have these elements, too. Why? Because an
author's purpose involves calling our attention to the real meaning of events
we wouldn't normally notice or attribute much significance to.
- Examples
for 251 students: Interpret the symbolism in the various dreams that
appear throughout the story. Also, why must Gilgamesh cross the boiling
acid river of death? What can we learn from the characteristics of the
river and from the way Gilgamesh deals with the situation?
- Examples
for 252 students: What's the significance of the objects found at the
bottom of the well (pages 595-6)? What do they tell us about the people of
the neighborhood, and why? Why does Saikaku painstakingly list all the
items in the bundle Osen throws as her offering to the matchmaker at the
bottom of page 600? What can we learn about Osen, about the matchmaker,
and about the town by thinking about the contents of this bundle?
THEME: We often speak of the "theme" of a story. Most people know
that this term refers to some point the story makes, often a moral or a lesson
learned either by a character or by the readers. What many readers don't seem
to know is that no story has only one theme. That's why two different readers
can disagree about what "the theme" of a story is. Usually when they
do so, both are right. That is, any one story potentially teaches many
different kinds of lessons about life. You choose what lesson you think is
most important by picking the conflict that you think is most significant or
most central to the story. That takes us back to our discusson of plot. Now
we can see why it's so important to discuss plot in the right way, by analyzing
the conflicts, not just by retelling the story.
- Examples
for 251 students. If Gilgamesh's conflicts with Ishtar and the monsters
are more important than any other conflict, the theme of Gilgamesh
could be stated like this: The ancient epic of Gilgamesh shows us that
man's fate is to tame nature regardless of what it costs him. If
Enkidu's conflict with palace life is the most important conflict, the
theme of Gilgamesh could be stated like this: The story of
Gilgamesh shows us that man believes he's superior to the animals and his
civilization is superior to life in the wild. But the truth is that man
was probably happier as an animal.
- Examples
for 252 students. If the interpersonal conflicts matter the most, the
theme of the story could be stated like this: In "The Barrelmaker
Brimful of Love," Saikaku shows us how the modern world has turned
human feelings, even love, into commodities to be bought and consumed.
If the matchmaker's conflicts with society are most important, the theme
of the story could be stated like this: Saikaku's story shows us that
workers can only survive in the bougeois world by turning the moral code
and ambitions of the bourgeois into weapons against them. On the other
hand, if what matters most is that the conflicts are about sex, the theme
of the story might sound like this: Saikaku shows us the consequences
of modern urban society's hypocritical denial of sexual urges.
RETURN TO 251 SYLLABUS.
RETURN TO 252 SYLLABUS.