Last week, I visited the Taconian Unconformity in the Catskills region of New York. I found out about the outcrop via the informative website the USGS put together in 2003 to explain southeastern New York's varied and interesting geology (Click here for a map).

Here's me at the angular unconformity, demonstrating the layering with my forearms:


Here's the same outcrop, sans goofball, avec annotations:


This is a classic angular unconformity. It even graced the cover of the (excellent) GSA publication Excursions in Geology and History: Field Trips in the Middle Atlantic States (Frank Pazzaglia, editor; cover photo by Marli Miller). Why should we care? Because like the "original" angular unconformity at Siccar Point in Scotland (described by James Hutton), this outcrop represents a lot of geologic time. First, during the Ordovician period, the Austin Glen formation had to be deposited as layers of clastic sediment in an ocean basin. Then, during the late Ordovician Taconian Orogeny, those layers had to be deformed: folded and buckled so they stood up on end, and then eroded down to their nubs. Then, on that newly-formed erosional surface, a fresh layer of sediment had to be laid down, in this case, the Rondout Formation was deposited as a layer of carbonate mud during the late Silurian period. Then, that too was deformed, during the Devonian period's Acadian Orogeny. Finally, the whole package had to be uplifted to the surface and exposed (in this case, when a highway roadcut was completed). That's a lot of time!

I'm delighted to have had the opportunity to visit it first-hand!

Labels: devonian, maps, mountains, new york, ordovician, silurian, structure, travel, unconformities

Good morning! I'm in New Paltz, New York, right now, on my way up to the Adirondacks for several days of fun, to be followed by a visit to a geologist pal in Drumlin Land, and then a quick excursion to visit some other friends in Canada. Later this morning I'll visit the Taconic angular unconformity outside of Catskill, New York. I'll try and post photos and whatnot as I go, in the same manner as yesterday's ptygmatic fold post -- my first ever remote post from the new iPhone. But I forgot to bring the iPhone charger, so we'll see how I do... Anyhow, stay tuned.

Labels: canada, mountains, new york, tech, travel, unconformities

What's the tallest mountain on Earth?

Everest, right? Well, yeah: if you're measuring from sea level. If you're measuring from the top of the crust the mountain rises from though, it's Mauna Kea, Hawai'i. It's about ~13,800 feet above sea level, but it rises ~33,500 feet from the oceanic crust to the peak (that's compared to Everest's mere ~29,000 feet from base to peak. So... you could say that Mauna Kea is the tallest mountain on our planet... (you could!)

On Thanksgiving day, my friend Lily and I took a drive up to the top of Mauna Kea, and did a little hike up there at high elevation. Today, I'd like to share some photographs of that excursion. We saw some pretty cool geology.

On the drive up the mountain, we saw an animal which was apropos, considering the day:

Gobble, gobble, gobble. Watch out turkeys, we'll be back after we work up an appetite...

Here's Lily's jeep in the "saddle" between Mauna Kea and Mauna Loa, looking north (with Mauna Kea in the background and basaltic lava flows from Mauna Loa in the foreground):


Some cider cones (the Hawai'ian word for cinder cone is pu'u) in the saddle:


Turning the other way (looking south), you can see the bulky form of "the long mountain," Mauna Loa. What a classic shield volcano shape! I love the fact that it's so dang wide it makes a lousy photograph. You just can't capture its spread-out bulk in a photo; it's too massive:


This was the spot where I pretended to have my toes overrun by a pahoehoe flow:


As we drove up the road to the top of the mountain, I was amazed at the raw volcanic landscape, decorated with cinder cones like this one:


At one point, we passed a neat little angular unconformity on the roadside. Here it is, with a nickel (white dot left of center) for scale:


Here's a closer-shot of this small angular unconformity. Earlier layers of ash and lapilli were deposited at a steep angle, and then eroded (perhaps by glaciation? pure speculation there) before more ash and lapilli were deposited atop it, at a lower angle. There's not likely to be much time missing here, and so perhaps it's better to think of this as the top of a cross-bed, an advancing front of pyroclastic deposition moving down the mountainside, overrun by later eruptions, which may have scoured off the upper few inches (??? pure speculation) or so before deposition.

Really, the truncated tops of cross-beds are mini-angular-unconformities, when you think about it; just not with the same amount of time missing at a "real" angular unconformity (with millions of years missing) due to mountain building like the one at Siccar Point. (Video of cross-beds forming)

Here's something else which the clueless geologist might mistake for a sign of mountain building:
No, those aren't originally-horizontal strata that have later been folded. They're layers (again of ash and lapilli) deposited on the originally-rough topography of the mountainside, covering small ridges and filling small valleys. Where a given layer is exposed at higher elevation, I interpret to be a paleo-topographic high; where that same stratum is exposed at lower elevation, that's a paleo-topographic low. The roadcut reveals these layers have undulating shapes, but this is unlikely to be folding that results from tectonic compression: instead, I think it's showing us the lay of the ancient land surface.

Looking south, we could see past Mauna Loa to the actively erupting steam vent coming out of Halemaumau Crater at Kilauea Caldera (source of the vog!):


Near the summit of Mauna Kea, there are a bunch of astronomical observatories:






On the summit is where you find those examples I mentioned the other day of hawaiite, a rock of basaltic composition that is very dense (ostensibly due to erupting beneath the extra pressures of a Pleistocene ice cap):


Here's me on the summit:


View to the north from the summit: More cinder cones...


Here's a YouTube video of me pointing stuff out from the summit (Kilauea, Hualalai, Mauna Loa, observatories, hikers, etc.). Unfortunately the wind makes it all but unintelligable, but I filmed it, doggone it, so I'm going to post it:



I found a beautiful example of a volcanic bomb up there:


After the visit to the summit, we went for a hike to a small supposedly-glacially-gouged-out lake below the summit (Lake Waiau):


Here's a Google Map, showing the lake's location:


I was surprised to see a thick biofilm on the bottom of the lake:


Encrusting the pebbles and cobbles there, it reminded me of Nora Noffke's modern and Archean biofilm photos in the recent GSA Today, as well as my "Life in Extreme Environments" class this past summer at Montana State University.


We saw some nice examples of structural geology on this hike. Previously, I've mentioned plumose structure, a branching pattern on the topography of fracture surfaces in fine-grained rocks. We saw some of that on blocks of basalt atop Mauna Kea, as in this example (again a repeat photo, but the other day I showed it to you for the vesicle; today I'm showing it to you for the plumose structure.)


A similar feature are arrest lines, which again are minute variations in the surface of a fracture. Like plumose structure, which branches from a source point (where the fracture initiated) and branches out in the direction of propagation, arrest lines tell us about the development of a joint. Unlike plumose structure, though, they are not parallel to the propagating fracture front. Instead, they form perpendicular to it, and record how the fracture propagates in small "steps." Each of these arrest lines is interpreted as being a spot where the fracture grew a little bit, then stopped ("arrested") and then grew some more. In this case, the fracture face we're looking at started at the bottom of the picture and grew towards the top of the photo. You can even see some less-discernible plumose structure backing this up:

Similar arrest lines can be seen in basalt images here and here...

We also saw some pretty spectacular xenoliths. Here's one of gabbro in basalt:


Here's one of peridotite in basalt:


And a few more:



My boots, with another volcanic bomb:


Driving back down the mountain afterwards, we got this nice view of the cinder cones (pu'us!) in the eastern part of the "saddle" between Maunas Kea and Loa:


This Mauna Kea excursion was one of my favorite things that I did on my all-too-brief trip to Hawaii. It was great to get up in the high country, where the air is thin (and vog free!) and the skies are deep blue, and the geology is surprisingly varied (at least it was surprising to me, and pleasantly so). The hike let us work up a good appetite, so we headed back down the mountain and straight to Thanksgiving dinner!

Labels: basalt, birdies, geology, glacial landforms, hawaii, igneous, mountains, msse, primary structures, structure, travel, unconformities, volcano, xenoliths

This summer, I saw "the Great Unconformity" in a couple of locations.

An unconformity is a break in the local geologic record -- a period of time which elapsed without being recorded by the deposition of rock units. Often unconformities mark places where erosion has erased part of the local rock record, but sometimes they just mark periods of non-deposition. (Analogy: You can get a blank page in your diary two ways. You can either take a day off from writing, or you can write that day's entry and then later go back and erase it. Either way, you end up with a day going by and no journal entry.) People call the major break between metamorphic and igneous "basement" rocks and overlying sedimentary layers the "Great" Unconformity, though it's not the same age everywhere. It's just shorthand, really.

Anyhow, here it is in the Grand Canyon (photos provided below are both unadorned and annotated versions):





Give or take, there's about 1.2 billion years missing along this ancient erosional surface. Intuitively, this probably makes sense, since metamorphic rocks like schist and 'distilled' intrusive rocks like granite are characteristics of mountain belts, where they form at depth. In order to get those interior-mountain-belt rocks to the surface takes lots of erosion over lots of time (though not necessarily that long -- in DC, for instance, we have interior-mountain-belt rocks exposed that 'only' took 360 million years to make it to the surface). In the above photos, the metamorphic rocks and granites below the unconformity formed about 1.7 billion years ago, during the Mazatzal Orogeny, and the sedimentary layers on top (both quartz sandstones) were deposited in the Cambrian period, about 543-488 million years ago. They represent passive margin sedimentation along an ancient transgressive seashore, something like modern day beach sands along the east coast of North America. So, to get something like the Great Unconformity, take something like coastal Maine (Acadia National Park, say), and bury it beneath something like Virginia Beach.

And here "it" is again, in Wyoming's Wind River Canyon (between Thermopolis and Shoshoni):





A zoomed-in look at this same outcrop:





This time, however, the rocks below the unconformity are much older* metamorphics (schist & amphibolite) and granite. According to Maughan (1987), these are the oldest rocks exposed in Wyoming, having formed about 2.9 billion years ago. They were then metamorphosed at 2.75 billion years ago. These truely ancient rocks (Archean) were then eroded and exposed at the surface, where quartz-rich sand was laid down atop their burnished roots. Aside from the difference in the age of the underlying basement rocks, the story is very similar to the one at the Grand Canyon.

* Thanks very much to Kim, who pointed out my error in under-stating their age in an earlier, more-poorly-researched version of this post.

Reference:
Maughan, E.K. (1987) "Wind River Canyon, Wyoming." In: Geological Society of America Centennial Field Guide - Rocky Mountain Section. S.S. Buess, ed. p. 191196.

Labels: archean, cambrian, dc, grand canyon, primary structures, proterozoic, unconformities, wyoming

Later this month, I'm leading a tour for "Walkingtown, DC" a twice-annual event sponsored by Cultural Tourism DC, a nonprofit organization. My tour is called "History Before History: the geologic saga of Washington, DC." I'll be leading the tour on both Saturday, April 26, and Sunday, April 27, from 1-4pm. If you're in the area, consider coming along. We'll be discussing the deposition of sediments in the Iapetus Ocean, generation of an accretionary wedge, the Taconian Orogeny, the Rock Creek Shear Zone, emplacement of the Georgetown Intrusive suite, and finally the erosion of the young Appalachian mountains and the deposition of dinosaur-fossil-bearing river gravels atop the unconformity: the Potomac Group. As a bonus, we'll even visit a thrust fault which ruptures the unconformity at the intersection of Adams Mill Road and Clydesdale Place, NW. It's a nice little jaunt through prehistory. However, this hike was extremely popular last year: we had ~300 people show up! So I've asked Cultural Tourism DC to institute a reservation system this time around: I'm limiting participation to 30 people per day. Act now to reserve your place by calling or e-mailing Cultural Tourism DC.

Here's two pictures of the mad crowds last spring. I get the heebie-jeebies just thinking about it:

Labels: action, dc, dinosaurs, geology, granite, metamorphism, sediment, unconformities

Last Friday, I had a fun local field trip, in search of ultramafic rocks included in the Piedmont's metamorphosed accretionary wedge complex. My companions on the trip were David and John, both of whom are retired gentlemen pursuing geology as a hobby. Because they're doing geology for fun, they are among the most dedicated and interested students I've met at NOVA. Friday's trip was something I've been meaning to do for a while, and both of them thought it sounded like an eye-opener, so they came along too.

Our goal was to find some new outcrops that we hadn't seen before. Of primary interest were several mafic and ultramafic bodies included in the larger metasedimentary complex of rocks that we know today as the Piedmont. As I've mentioned before, these Piedmont rocks are interpreted as being the rocks of an ancient (Neoproterozoic - Paleozoic) ocean basin. When the ocean basin closed during Appalachian mountain-building, the sediments of the ocean got squished and squeezed between North America and Africa. Mixed in with them were chunks of the ancient Iapetus Ocean crust, which would probably be recognizable as ophiolites if it weren't for that pesky regional metamorphism they endured as a result of the collision. Up and down the east coast, there are outcrops of these mafics and ultramafics along the presumed "suture" zone between ancestral North America and terranes (blocks of crust) that were once a volcanic island arc in the Iapetus Ocean. As with most geology field trips, we also found some other stuff worth noting, even though it wasn't our primary objective.

Our first stop (located thanks to Diecchio & Gottfried (2004) in USGS Circular 1264) was in Clifton, Virginia, where we went to see the unconformity between the Piedmont metamorphic rocks and the Triassic sedimentary rocks which overlie them in an ancient rift valley called the Culpeper Basin. Tragically, instead of a beautiful outcrop, we found freshly graded surfaces and several new McMansions. There was only a small strip of undeveloped land, about 20 feet wide and 50 feet long which had any rock left. But in that area, we found an outcrop of soapstone. Here, John scratches the soapstone (talc) with his fingernail. It's soft!

In this case, the soapstone is interpreted as being metamorphosed ultramafic rock. Close to it, we found this piece of conglomerate:

The conglomerate is the base of the sedimentary sequence in the Culpeper Basin: it's the Reston Member of the Manassas Sandstone Formation. Notice that it contains clasts of foliated metamorphic rocks -- these were derived from the older Piedmont rocks it unconformably overlies. The Piedmont rocks got metamorphosed during Appalachian mountain-building, and then when Pangea broke up, the Culpeper Basin (one of the Newark Supergroup basins) opened up and got filled in. The source for the infilling sediment was the neighboring area, not surprisingly including pieces of the Piedmont. Up-sequence, the conglomerate is overlain by the regular Manassas Sandstone, which is a rich brick red in color (classic Triassic red beds), and contains a wealth of primary sedimentary structures. I found this one piece, which unfortunately broke into chunks when I picked it up:

It displays ripple marks, raindrop impressions, and a few horizontal branching trace fossils. Anyhow, that was about it for the Clifton stop. We were bummed about the development destroying the outcrop. On to the next location, Indian Run, on the east side of Annandale. There, using the geologic map that accompanied Drake & Lyttle (1981), we walked along the creek bed looking for exposures of rock. We didn't have to go far before seeing some heavily-rusted green rocks:

The above photo is dominantly chlorite, but check this out:

Pyroxene-rich inclusions (xenoliths? olistoliths?) were observable in the heavily-weathered exposures. The outcrops here were saprolitic, meaning they were essentially "rotten rock." David was struck by how soft they were. He said "It feels like velvet!" We turned our attention to the more coherent specimens which were weathered out and deposited as cobbles in the streambed. I got a watermelon-sized specimen that's about 40% massive peridotite and 60% greenschist. (I showcased this leprechaun-colored specimen last night in Historical Geology lecture, when we were discussing the Taconian Orogeny.) We also found intriguing hints of mountain-building in clasts like this:

That's a couple of beautiful folds in gneissic metamorphic foliation. As above, the bright green minerals are chlorite. We also found some cobbles of sedimentary rocks mixed in with the locally-derived metamorphic rocks. For instance, here's a nice semispherical cobble of flint, likely derived from the flint-bearing limestones of the Shenandoah Valley:

How did this flint nodule travel ~50 miles from its source area to its current resting place in Indian Run? Likely, it was transported by an ancestral version of the Potomac River, which brought many westward-derived cobbles eastward during the Cretaceous. About 100 million years ago, this river deposited a layer of cobbles all over our local area, preserved today as the Potomac Formation. It unconformably overlies the Piedmont rocks, and can be found today as the basal layer of the Coastal Plain. It's even found as a layer topping our highest local hills. The exposures in Indian Run actually offered a nice view of the unconformity surface, with foliated metamorphic rocks below, and unlithified Cretaceous gravel deposits on top:

Just to close out this post, I'll show a few other cobbles found in the streams. Here's a gneiss containing big, beautiful porphyroblasts of garnet:

And here's a Skolithos-bearing boulder of the Antietam Formation (quartz sandstone / quartzite), which I originally posted a few days ago, but is so gorgeous it should be shown again if I'm talking about boulders.

Finally, as a preview of tomorrow's post, I'll show a boulder which hints at the complex relationship between the foliated metamorphic rocks (gneisses) of the Piedmont and felsic igneous rocks (granites) which were derived from the partial melting of the gneiss. In other words, this is a boulder of migmatite: rock that has experienced partial melting. We'll explore this in more depth with some in situ photographs tomorrow.

Labels: appalachians, culpeper basin, field trips, flint, geology, nova, piedmont, unconformities, virginia

Geological Travels in Northern Ireland, Part VII:

Ground moraine being used (quite appropriately) as a golf course, east of Port Rush.

An old quarry south of the road between Bushmills and Port Rush. This is easily accessible from the parking area for White Rocks, a popular surfing beach. (Yes, they surf in December in Northern Ireland!)

Well-exposed here is the unconformity between the Cretaceous-aged "Chalk" (the Ulster White Limestone) and the overlying "Lower" Basalts (Paleogene in age).

The ancient topography is revealed in the undulations of the unconformity surface: prominently featured here is an ancient valley that was topped off with basaltic lava during the eruption. Valley depth in this photo is about 80 feet.

The limestone ("Chalk") here was quarried for lime. Lime is the binding agent in cement and mortar, and it is produced from the burning of limestone. Disused kilns from the burning process were still situated in the quarry. The area was lousy with flint nodules, like the one here. I collected a beautiful one that looked like a cross between a sausage and a powdered donut, but security confiscated it from my carry-on luggage on my flight back home.

Labels: antrim coast, basalt, chalk, concretions, flint, geology, glacial landforms, northern ireland, unconformities