Last week, I visited the Taconian Unconformity in the Catskills region of New York. I found out about the outcrop via the informative website the USGS put together in 2003 to explain southeastern New York's varied and interesting geology (Click here for a map).

Here's me at the angular unconformity, demonstrating the layering with my forearms:


Here's the same outcrop, sans goofball, avec annotations:


This is a classic angular unconformity. It even graced the cover of the (excellent) GSA publication Excursions in Geology and History: Field Trips in the Middle Atlantic States (Frank Pazzaglia, editor; cover photo by Marli Miller). Why should we care? Because like the "original" angular unconformity at Siccar Point in Scotland (described by James Hutton), this outcrop represents a lot of geologic time. First, during the Ordovician period, the Austin Glen formation had to be deposited as layers of clastic sediment in an ocean basin. Then, during the late Ordovician Taconian Orogeny, those layers had to be deformed: folded and buckled so they stood up on end, and then eroded down to their nubs. Then, on that newly-formed erosional surface, a fresh layer of sediment had to be laid down, in this case, the Rondout Formation was deposited as a layer of carbonate mud during the late Silurian period. Then, that too was deformed, during the Devonian period's Acadian Orogeny. Finally, the whole package had to be uplifted to the surface and exposed (in this case, when a highway roadcut was completed). That's a lot of time!

I'm delighted to have had the opportunity to visit it first-hand!

Labels: devonian, maps, mountains, new york, ordovician, silurian, structure, travel, unconformities

I've been meaning to go check out the Soapstone Valley for years, but finally got around to it on Memorial Day. The park is a valley that shoots off to the east from Rock Creek Park, with an eastern terminus at Connecticut Avenue:



I didn't have far to walk before I found my first cobble of soapstone. It felt soapy in my hand, and was easily scratched by my fingernail. (Fingernail = 2.5 on the Mohs scale of hardness; talc = 1) I found it interesting that the soapstone cobbles had less algae growing on them than the other cobbles in the stream... Hmm. Because they slough off their outer layers more easily? Or because there's something chemical going on that prevents algae growth?


Why does anyone care about soapstone? Well, people who care about prehistory are interested in soapstone because it was easily carved to make various artifacts. As a geologist, I'm more interested in it because it's a metamorphic rock that implies an ultramafic protolith. In other words, as the various rocks that would become DC's bedrock were squished and squeezed and heated during Taconian mountain-building, one of the ingredients in the mix may have been a peridotite. As the graywacke around it metamorphosed to metagraywacke, the putative peridotite metamorphosed into soapstone.

The stuff I found in Soapstone Valley is a talc schist with porphyroblasts or relict phenocrysts of something dark and chunky in it:


Here's a close-up. The big crystals were dark green, like augite, but they had a texture that looked more like hornblende. Not sure as to their identity. I'll put one under the microscope later to try and suss out the relationship between the cleavage planes.


They're definitely mafic though! Here's an example where the large crystals are rusted out:


So there was plenty of soapstone float, but no bedrock outcrops. At first, I was in the highly foliated metagraywacke schist of the Rock Creek Shear Zone...


...but as I headed upstream I found boulders of the Kensington Tonalite, implying exposures of the KT further up the valley...


... and sure enough, that's what I found. This is the Kensington Tonalite, a late Ordovician granitoid.


Where I first crossed the contact, I thought it looked a little odd, and then a later look at the geologic map of the Washington West quadrangle (Fleming, et al., 1995):

Fleming, et al., list it as a sheared biotite tonalite of the Georgetown Intrusive Suite, which I guess explains its appearance as distinct from the Kensington Tonalite.

When I got up to the eastern edge of the park, I saw the source of the stream:


The valley widens out here, almost as if the rock is weaker... And where concrete has been poured (to stabilize the slope??) the underlying rock is etched away: it's the super-soft soapstone...


Here's a boulder of soapstone (my fingernail scratches it to demonstrate that it's soft):


Here's the geologic map of the area. You can see Soapstone Valley cutting an east-west swath across the strike of the structures. ("ss" means "soapstone"...)

My annotations on Tony Fleming's map (reference below).

Reference:
Geologic map of the Washington west quadrangle, District of Columbia, Montgomery and Prince Georges Counties, Maryland, and Arlington and Fairfax Counties, Virginia. Anthony H. Fleming, Lucy McCartan, and Avery Ala Drake. U.S. Geological Survey (Reston, VA), 1995.
_________________________________________________________________

A quick tangent to note a milestone: this is my 700^th post on NOVA Geoblog. Thanks to everyone for reading. Looking forward to 700 more...

Labels: appalachians, dc, granite, igneous, metamorphism, minerals, ordovician, piedmont

Done with the Cockeysville Marble and fortified with chocolate malts from the Twin Kiss, we ventured on to "Mineral Hill," interpreted as a paleo-black-smoker site from the deep Iapetus. This is a zone of mafic and ultramafic rocks that have been metamorphosed and also mineralized with a suite of sulfide minerals, including pyrite, chalcopyrite, bornite, covellite, and carrollite (in fact, this is the type locality for carrollite). Presumably it was a SedEx-type deposit in the Iapetus Ocean basin. It is geographically associated with the Baltimore Mafic Complex, which is most readily interpreted as a dismembered slice of the Iapetus oceanic lithosphere (that is, an ophiolite). As the Iapetus closed during the Taconian Orogeny, it was accreted to North America and metamorphosed.

The petrology students start picking up pieces from the massive pile of tailings in search of treasures:


Talc shist (soapstone) with malachite:


More of the same:


I forget what this one was, but I loved the "spray" pattern of its bladed crystals:


Chrysotile asbestos:


Pyrite:




And lots and lots of magnetite! These are some of my refrigerator magnets stuck to it:


One more stop to go: the Ellicott City Granodiorite...

Labels: appalachians, maryland, metamorphism, minerals, ophiolites, ordovician, ore

Yesterday, I showed you the Port Deposit Tonalite, stop #1 on the University of Maryland's annual ig/met pet trip. Today I'll share pictures of the next stop. We voyaged to the Hunt Valley Shopping Mall, where a lovely exposure of the Setters Schist can be found.

It's a lovely example of a classic-looking muscovite schist:


It is also chock-full of garnets! Millions and millions of them....

Some are small:


Some are medium:


Some are large:


Some are fresh:


Some are weathered:


Some are weathered-out:


There's also staurolite present:




Here's a nice big chunky staurolite:


In one localized zone, we also see some very big, rather lovely kyanite:




...Awesome! I love this suite of metamorphic minerals!

The Setters Schist is a highly metamorphosed pelitic rock (meaning that its protolith was clay-rich). It was presumably metamorphosed in the late-Ordovician-aged Taconian Orogeny, like everything else in the Mid-Atlantic Piedmont.

Next up, another member of the Glenarm Series, the Cockeysville Marble...

Labels: appalachians, maryland, metamorphism, minerals, ordovician, piedmont

Yesterday, I was fortunate enough to be able to tag along on the University of Maryland's petrology field trip, to five locations in Maryland showcasing a variety of igneous and metamorphic rocks. I'd like to thank Rich Walker and Roberta Rudnick for allowing me to come along on the excursion, and UMD graduate student Ryan Kerrigan for alerting me to the trip's interesting rocks in the first place. They have a crew of enthusiastic students, and some cool outcrops!

Our first stop was in northern Maryland's Cecil County. Along the banks of the Susquehanna River, just upstream from the I-95 bridge, is an abandoned quarry of the Port Deposit Tonalite.

Here's Rich and Roberta leading us into the quarry:


UMD students examine the semi-overgrown outcrops of the tonalite:


Tonalites are kind of like granites, except they have only very low amounts of potassium feldspar. This particular tonalite has a magmatic crystallization age of 515 Ma (U/Pb in zircon) and a metamorphic age of 490-480 Ma (Rb/Sr in biotite). Close-up of the rock's texture:


ADDITION: Kim notes in the comments that I didn't draw an explicit connection between the metamorphism and the metamorphic foliation that is so prominent in this photo. She's right: The wavy linear pattern you see in this photo is produced by minerals aligned by differential pressure. Squeeze the rock "top to bottom" and you produce a foliation that runs "left to right."

On the basis of isotopic evidence, the Port Deposit Tonalite is interpreted to have formed as an igneous pluton offshore of ancestral North America, underneath an island arc in the Iapetus Ocean. Later, subduction brought the island arc into contact with North America, triggering the Taconian phase of Appalachian mountain-building.

Here's a closer look at the texture and mineralogy. You can see some k-spar present here, though this was not a common mineral to see at the outcrop...


There were some nice xenoliths present, indicative of the host rock into which the PDT intruded:


Here's a quartz vein cutting through the tonalite. You'll notice that the vein is emplaced approximately perpendicular to foliation, suggesting the same maximum stress which imparted the foliation also extended the rock parallel to the foliation place, opening up fractures that when then fill with the most mobilizable minerals available (in this case, quartz):


If you look closely, you'll see that the fracture which opened up in the tonalite to allow this vein to be emplaced has a ragged edge (not a clean break):


Next up: the Setters Schist...

Labels: appalachians, cambrian, granite, igneous, maryland, metamorphism, ordovician, structure, teaching, xenoliths

This month's GSA Today includes this image:

It's part of a figure in the featured article by Thomas Servais and colleagues, examining the diversification of life during the Ordovician period of geologic time. I think that this must be the simplest rendering of plate reconstruction I've ever seen (and that's not necessarily a bad thing). While there are certainly many salient details left off of such a rendering, it serves the purposes of the article well, correlating a rise in biodiversity with high sea levels and supercontinent breakup. (If supercontinent breakup produces high rates of sea-floor spreading, the large volume of the mid-ocean ridge will displace lots of seawater and cause eustatic sea level rise.)


Here's the image in the context of the diagram in which it appears:

What do you think? Is this over-simiplifed, or is it elegantly simple, given the context?

Reference:
Thomas Servais, David A.T. Harper, Axel Munnecke, Alan W. Owen, and Peter M. Sheehan. "Understanding the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event (GOBE): Influences of paleogeography, paleoclimate, or paleoecology," GSA Today, April/May 2009, pp. 4-10.

Labels: art, ordovician, plate tectonics

Walking to my car the other day, I looked up at the embankment on my street, and noticed some geology there I hadn't seen before. Yesterday, with my camera, I climbed up the embankment (~15 feet) to investigate. Fortunately there were some trees to hold onto.

Sure enough, it was as I suspected: dikes of granite (subvertical in orientation) that, along with the schistose bedrock they cut across, had totally weathered to saprolite.

Keys for scale:


Originally, these dikes were emplaced during the late-Ordovician eastern-North American episode of mountain-building called the Taconian ("Taconic") Orogeny. Later, when they got exposed at the surface (or close to it) they began to "rot."

Hand for scale:


Here's a video showing how readily these dikes formerly known as granite deform by crumbling into pieces:


The main chemical weathering process that has happened here to make this possible is the hydrolysis of feldspar to produce kaolinite, a clay mineral. Large single crystals of potassium feldspar in the granite are now large amorphous masses of kaolinite, which has no strength when stressed.

Labels: dc, granite, igneous, metamorphism, ordovician, weathering

I've discussed the phenomenon of jointing on this blog before, and how when rocks fracture, sometimes they leave behind structures we can see that tell us something about the jointing process. Where did it start? Where did it stop? To answer these questions, we turn to structures like plumose structure, arrest lines (concentric ribs), and hackle fringes.

On this past Sunday's field excursion out to the Massanutten Synclinorium (Shenandoah Valley), MSSE John Graves and I saw some more nice examples of these phenomena, and as usual, I took some photos of them.

Let's start with this one, which shows plumose structure (and thus joint propagation) starting at the right and heading to the left.



A closer-up shot of this same fracture surface (in the Ordovician Martinsburg Formation):



Here's another one (in the Devonian Needmore Formation):



Sorry -- no sense of scale in that (above) one -- it was a few feet above my head. Total width of the photo is about two feet (call it half a meter).

This one (also in the Needmore) shows some really wavy plumes:



At the end of joint surfaces, we find hackle fringes, these "rough edges" where the little ridges and valleys of the plumose "topography" flare up and out in a spiralling kind of shape. When you slice through this spiral shape, it appears as a series of little itty-bitty joints at an angle to the main joint. Here's some hackle fringes on a joint surface from the Martinsburg Formation:



Each of these represents the edge of the fracture at one point. But then stresses built up again past the rock's strength, and it cracked anew, extending the fracture and producing a new hackle fringe. A closer-up shot (rotated) of the above fringes:



And back to the Needmore again, for a lovely series of hackle fringes that I've shown you before, but I couldn't resist photographing again. But to mix it up a bit, this time I used a penny instead of a quarter for scale...



Contrastified version of the above, with annotations:



Lastly, remember that I showed you this photo on Monday, from the Billy Goat Trail?



Well, I think you can see some hackles there, too. Take a closer look...

Below, I've zoomed in on the far upper right of the previous photo, and rotated it 90 degrees. I've also transplanted the penny from another part of the photo to maintain a sense of scale, and drawn a quick sketch of the fractures:



I think the little itty-bitty fractures (again, infused with quartz, making them weather out in high relief) traversing the main left-right joint trace are hackle fringes associated with that joint. Anyone care to differ?

Labels: devonian, geology, joints, ordovician, quartz, structure, virginia

Yesterday I mentioned finding a new (to me) outcrop of the Martinsburg Formation's graded beds (turbidite sequences shed off the late-Ordovician Taconian Orogeny here on the east coast of North America). Today, I'd like to share a few images of where John Graves and I went next: up into the heart of the Massanutten Synclinorium, the Fort Valley. To remind you of the relationship between the Shenandoah and Fort Valleys, here's a Google Map I've posted before:



There, defining the ridges of Massanutten Mountain (and thereby separating the lower Shenandoah Valley from the upper Fort Valley) is the Massanutten Sandstone, a Silurian-aged quartz sandstone (in some places it's a quartz-pebble conglomerate) that is correlated to the Tuscarora Sandstone further west in the Appalachian Mountains' Valley & Ridge province.

The Massanutten can show some nice primary structures, including some of the oldest known terrestrial plant fossils (preserved as fragmentary carbon films) and cross-bedding like this:



With regard to the cross-bedding, note that this is "reverse" cross-bedding, which records shifts in current direction over time. At the bottom of the sample, the current was flowing from left to right, and at the middle and top of the sample, it was flowing in the opposite direction, right to left. This sample shows well the distinctive shape of cross-beds: they are tangential to the main bed at the bottom, but are often truncated on top, making them superb geopetal indicators. (They tell you whether your rock is right-side-up or up-side-down.)

I took John on a hike up the Veatch Gap trail, because I wanted to show him the awesome anticline in the Massanutten Sandstone that NOVA adjunct geology instructor Chris Khourey and I had found on a reconnaissance trip out there in May of last year. John and I took a "group shot" with the fold:



And here's John showing those Montanans that we do actually have some cool geology out on the east coast:



So, what's going on here? Well... the Valley & Ridge province of the mid-Atlantic region is defined by folded (and thrust-faulted) sedimentary strata. These folds were produced about 300 to 250 million years ago, during the Alleghenian phase of Appalachian mountain-building. The tectonic cause of this deformation is interpreted to be North America's collision with Africa, closing the Iapetus Ocean and completing the assembly of the supercontinent Pangea.

More locally, the Shenandoah Valley and Massanutten Mountain are structurally underlain by a great fold, the Massanutten Synclinorium. Synclinoria are different from mere synclines because they are more complicated: the overall synclinal shape is "decorated" with numerous smaller anticlines and synclines. It's a big trough-like shape, but wrinkles are "parasitic" on the main fold. So, even within the big "canoe" shape of the Massanutten Synclinorium, there are little bulges and wrinkles that go the opposite direction. This anticline is one of them.

At that point, having seen the anticline, we weighed whether to keep hiking or not.

We opted to press on... and I'm so glad we did. ... Twenty feet further down the trail, we saw another two anticlines!



At its base, this one had a small cave I could crawl into:



And: a short distance further we found a hiker's shelter with an apt name:



Ha! I love it.

More tomorrow, when I'll revisit the issue of plumose structure and hackle fringes.

Labels: appalachians, geology, mountains, msse, ordovician, primary structures, sediment, silurian, structure, valley and ridge, virginia

Yesterday, I mentioned what my MSSE advisor John Graves and I saw along the Billy Goat Trail on Saturday afternoon. Today, I'd like to share some images and insights from our Sunday field trip, out to the Shenandoah Valley and the Massanutten Synclinorium which underlies it.

I would like to thank Rick Diecchio of George Mason University for sharing some key outcrop knowledge with me. I've found that information about good outcrops can be very difficult to obtain unless you know somebody who knows. The information is primarily passed on through the oral tradition, rather than written in sufficient detail in peer-reviewed literature or in field guides (...or posted on geoblogs?).

Anyhow, back in December, on our drive down to the Blue Ridge / Valley & Ridge Symposium in Charlottesville, I told Rick I was organizing a new Massanutten Synclinorium field course. It's a place he's very familar with. He recommended a good outcrop to see the turbidite sequences of the Martinsburg Formation, a late Ordovician clastic unit made of debris shed off the rising Taconian Mountains to the east. Rick drew me a map in my field notebook, and on Sunday I was finally able to schedule a visit. Since John is unfamiliar with the stratigraphy and structure of the Shenandoah Valley (or the east coast in general), we also stopped at a lot of the other stops I'll be taking students to, including the classic "Tumbling Run" section.

Today I'd like to share a sets of photos with you from this new (to me) outcrop of the Martinsburg Formation. Tomorrow I will share another set from the next layer up in the stratigraphic stack, the Massanutten Sandstone. Both outcrops a pleasing combination of sedimentary stratification and structural geology.

Here's the Martinsburg Formation outcrop, just west of the Shenandoah River's North Fork:


This, like the "Pet Store Anticline" that I have previously blogged about, is an excellent place to look at bedding/cleavage relationships. The beds are dipping east, but the cleavage dips steeply to the west, implying the outcrop's position within a much larger (kilometers-wide) cleavage fan.

Here's a eye-catching outcrop that shows the beds weathered out differentially, while pervasively cut by ~vertical metamorphic cleavage:


More beds, of alternating sand and mud, steeply dipping in the Massanutten Synclinorium:

Note how the muddier portions show cleavage development better than the sandier strata.

More pervasively-cleaved muddy layers:


Here's one that confused me. In this predominantly-sandstone layer, you can see that the cleavage is better developed on the right, lower side of the bed. Does this mean that the right, lower-side of the bed is more mud-rich? (and sand-poor?) It did appear to be finer grained. If so, does this imply this bed is upside-down? Ordinarily, I would have thought to only look for the primary sedimentary structure as a geopetal (right-side-up) indicator, but this is the first time it has occurred to me that structural susceptibility based on mineralogy (in this case, susceptibility to cleavage development) could be used as an indicator of younging direction. I should note that this particular photo was taken downhill of the main outcrop, and may well be overturned. It's a synclinorium, after all, not a smooth syncline!


In this photo, the turbidite sequences of the Martinsburg Formation show a cool feature, a primary sedimentary structure known as cross-bedding:

Note that this photo is taken with the photo's long axis ~parallel to bedding, but the reality of the outcrop is that this is all steeply dipping, rotated 90 degrees clockwise (see the inset for "true" outcrop orientation).

...But wait! There's stuff dipping to the left, and stuff dipping to the right! Which one is this purported cross-bedding? Try this labelled version to sort it all out:

Note how at the bottom, the cross-beds curve tangentially to subparallelism with the main bed. They are truncated at top by the overlying layers. This is a good geopetal indicator, and the photo is oriented in depositional position, with the top at the top. Furthermore, if you reconstruct the current direction from these cross-beds (after the strata have been "unfolded" and restored to their original horizontal orientation, it would have come from the east... that is, from the orogen itself (the roots of which are exposed along the Billy Goat Trail.)

The intersection of rock weaknesses along the planes of bedding and planes of cleavage can result in the rock fracturing into long pencil-like bits, a phenomenon known as "pencil cleavage." This is my Freddy Krueger impersonation using the Martinsburg's cleaved "pencils."


John puts his hand up to give a sense of scale to the axis of this small fold in the steeply-dipping strata:


I was all agog over this outcrop, really digging the relationship between the structure and sedimentological elements in the rock. Best of all, it's a very short drive from Tumbling Run, and will replace the hike to the Buzzard Rock outcrop in my Massanutten field trip in April. (For NOVA-area readers, there are still four spaces open in that class...)

Labels: appalachians, mountains, msse, ordovician, primary structures, sediment, structure, valley and ridge

Yesterday, I took a three Honors students and a colleague to Difficult Run, Virginia. This is a hiking trail that goes from Georgetown Pike, in the tony neighborhood of McLean, Virginia, down through a deep, steep river valley to the Potomac River.

As noted a couple days ago, the trail is right across the Potomac River from my beloved Billy Goat Trail. In a recap from that post, here's a map of the area... Feel free to switch it to "satellite" view.



Some discussion of the bedrock geology of Difficult Run can be found here, in an excellent field trip guide by Scott Southworth (USGS) and colleagues that's part of Excursions in Geology and History (Frank Pazzaglia, editor).

We began our trip by meeting up with Doug Dupin of the Palisades Museum of Prehistory, who joined us for our exploratory geohike. We walked a short distance down the trail and found a big (abandoned) quarry where it was rumored there was a good fault. This is one of these pieces of information that I heard somewhere, at some point. I couldn't find it in any literature, so maybe I heard it in discussion when I taught at George Mason University for a year between grad school and when I got my position at NOVA. Anyhow, I had never actually checked it out...

...So our first order of business was to review the criteria for identifying a fault: What would we look for? Fault breccia, fault gouge, slickensides, hydrous mineral veins, and of course, offset. However, here in the Virginia Piedmont, it's rare to have a good marker unit to compare on opposite sides of the fault: usually it's just schist on one side, schist on the other. In some places, you could add the presence of a fault scarp to that list, but being as how this was an old quarry, geomorphic features like that didn't seem likely. So our search focused on the search for fault breccia, fault gouge, veins of odd minerals, and slickensides.

A few minutes in, we found some slickensides on this boulder of float:

This is a boulder of migmatitic phyllonite, with a wavy texture due to mylonitic flow at depth. (The picture doesn't show this very well at all, though you can see faint undulations 'cascading' from the top of the photo towards the bottom. It's much clearer in cross-section.) Anyhow, the 'slicks' are a faint upper-left to lower-right lineation seen on this surface, one or two degrees off from the orientation of the ballpoint pen. The surface you're looking at here was a fault plane at some point in its history. Ballpoint pen for scale.

We did eventually locate the fault, uphill from this boulder. It was characterized by a zone of fault gouge (pulverized rock), three inches wide to a foot wide in places, and highly oxidized (presumably by oxygen-rich meteoric waters percolating along this fractured surface)... but there were no good marker units to judge the total offset.

Here's a different section through a similar rock (though I wouldn't apply the "phyllonite" textural description to this one). Instead of looking at the plane of foliation here, we're looking at a surface which is perpendicular to the foliation plane(s)....

Here in this image, you can see two cleavages... One which runs roughly upper-left to lower-right through the photo, defined by gneissic banding including bands of granite (light-colored; late Ordovician in age... Taconian Orogeny). A second cleavage runs roughly left-to-right through this photo. This second cleavage overprints the first. The overall interpretation is that the first cleavage developed due to lower-left-to-upper-right compression, forming the foliation defined by alternating bands of different compositions of minerals in an upper-left to lower-right direction. The second cleavage formed due to compressive stress sub-parallel to the pre-existing foliation, deforming it into a series of tight folds. The limbs of these folds line up parallel to one another, defining the second-generation, overprinting cleavage. Can anyone else add to this interpretation? Dime for scale.

Along Difficult Run itself, the outcrops were all relatively recently scoured (in 1972 by Hurricane Agnes), so there are some good exposures. As I noted earlier this week, the area shows some nice exposures of granite pegmatites (keys, and the edge of the Pazzaglia volume, for scale):


On our field trip yesterday, we took at closer look at these beautiful pegmatites, and the associated amphibolite bodies. Take a look at this close-up... Dime for scale.

What's going on here? You've got a beautiful (euhedral/subhedral) example of an orthoclase feldspar ("potassium feldspar") crystal amid a bunch of quartz. But look closer at the feldspar crystal... this sucker has been fractured in many places, and it's shot through with very small veins of quartz. Somehow, as this pegmatite dike was cooling, the earlier-crystallizing feldspar was broken and intruded by the presumably-still-fluid silica-rich magma. Anybody able to expand on this interpretation and shed some light on how this all played out? Or contradict it and give a different story to explain this relationship?

In the neighboring amphibolite, we checked out these cool ridges of resistant rock which are centered on thin fractures. Here, you see a couple of intersecting joint sets, each of which was the "plumbing system" for silica-rich hydrothermal fluids (my interpretation). These silica-rich hydrothermal fluids impregnated the surrounding amphibolite with quartz, which made the immediately-adjacent areas more silica-rich, and hence more resistant to weathering and erosion: Hence, now that they've made it to the surface, they're weathering out in high-relief. Dime for scale.


A bit further downstream, Doug showed us a 'cave' (central dark area, just to the right of the waterfall) between the bedrock and a big slab of sloughed-off migmatitic metagraywacke:

We each edged into the 'cave' to the end, where Doug has shown that a distinctly-rectangularly shaped hole admits a direct beam of sunlight during the fall and spring equinoxes. From the inside, it's a striking arrangement, enough to make you wonder whether it's anthropogenic. However, from the outside I was unconvinced that the hole's position was anything other than natural. Doug's initial intepretation of the site was strongly influenced by the fact that there are some unambiguous petroglyphs a short distance away from here, and based on this proximity, I think it's acceptable to infer that Native Americans may have visited this cave. However, I interpreted the opening to be completely natural, with no need to invoke anthropogenic modification in any way.

We hiked on along a ridge overlooking Mather Gorge, sighting a fox and an accipiter (Coopers? Sharp-shinned?) and a few vultures, and returned to the parking lot as the sun dipped low in the sky. On the way back to campus, Honors students Ana and Hope fed us Swiss cookies and cheese & crackers. Altogether, it was a pretty great way to spend a November afternoon...

Labels: birdies, faults, field trips, granite, igneous, metamorphism, ordovician, piedmont, rivers, virginia

This week, I'm taking some of my Honors students to Difficult Run, Virginia.

It's right across the Potomac River from my beloved Billy Goat Trail. Here's a map of the area:



Some discussion of the bedrock geology of Difficult Run can be found here, in an excellent field trip guide by Scott Southworth (USGS) and colleagues that's part of Excursions in Geology and History (Frank Pazzaglia, editor).

Here's a look at Difficult Run, looking upstream from below one of the several waterfalls there:



These outcrops were all relatively recently scoured (in 1972 by Hurricane Agnes), so there are some good exposures. We're going to look for a fault reported to be there, as well as the incision geomorphology of Difficult Run itself, and some nice exposures of granite pegmatites (keys for scale):





This field trip is less a guided tour, and more of an exploration, so I hope when we get back, I'll have some photos of new and interesting things to share.

Labels: faults, granite, igneous, metamorphism, ordovician, piedmont, rivers, virginia

It's that time of the semester, when the field trips are over, and the field trip essays start rolling in. These papers I assign are intended to be syntheses of the field trips I take my students on. I want them to interpret the landscape as a geologist would, and support each claim about geologic events in the past with supporting evidence observed or discussed on the trip.

I offer my students the opportunity to submit a rough draft of their field trip paper, and then I give them feedback about both content and formatting/writing style, so they have a chance to revise before submitting a final draft. Each semester, about a quarter of the students avail themselves of this opportunity for feedback before the "real" paper is due. Giving them quality feedback is a time-consuming process, but I feel it's important both to cement geologic concepts in their minds, and to guide them in developing their writing skills.

Accordingly, it's been a slow week for posting on this blog. I've been too busy with work. However, this morning it occurred to me that I could capitalize on my grading efforts by sharing a student essay with you all, edits and all. Why do I think you'll be interested in such a thing? (A) I think it gives some insight into the practice of teaching geology at the introductory college level, and (B) I think this is an excellent rough draft for an essay about Washington, DC's geologic history. The student's name, of course, has been redacted:

Labels: cretaceous, dc, geology, nova, ordovician, teaching

The coolest research website you haven't seen is on Whitney Hagadorn's page at Amherst.

With undergraduate student Martha Buck, he's taken pyritized trilobite fossils from the upper Ordovician Frankfort Shale ("Beecher's Trilobite Beds") near Rome, New York, and X-rayed them. A series of X-ray images taken at different angles have been spliced together into a movie, which gives a real sense of the three-dimensional nature of the fossil, as well as insight into the finer details of its anatomy like legs and antennae, which don't often fossilize:

This is Triarthrus eatoni. You can replay the movie by refreshing the page on your Internet browser. The full suite of images is available on this page. Check it out!

Labels: fossils, ordovician, websites